test: fix rooms-join flaky test#41072
Conversation
|
Looks like this PR is ready to merge! 🎉 |
|
WalkthroughThe join-room E2E spec now restores Changesrooms-join preview-c-room flow
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
apps/meteor/tests/e2e/rooms-join.spec.ts (1)
58-61: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🔵 Trivial | 💤 Low valueAdded comments conflict with the repo's "no implementation comments" rule.
The new explanatory comments at Lines 58-61, 73-74, and 102 document useful flaky-test reasoning, but the project guideline for Playwright test files is to avoid code comments in the implementation. Consider moving the rationale into the PR description or commit message and keeping the spec comment-free.
As per coding guidelines: "Avoid code comments in the implementation".
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@apps/meteor/tests/e2e/rooms-join.spec.ts` around lines 58 - 61, The added explanatory comments in the rooms join Playwright spec violate the repo’s no-implementation-comments rule. Remove the new rationale comments around the affected test blocks in rooms-join.spec and keep the test logic unchanged; if the flaky-test context needs to be preserved, move that explanation out of the spec into the PR description or commit message.Source: Coding guidelines
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Nitpick comments:
In `@apps/meteor/tests/e2e/rooms-join.spec.ts`:
- Around line 58-61: The added explanatory comments in the rooms join Playwright
spec violate the repo’s no-implementation-comments rule. Remove the new
rationale comments around the affected test blocks in rooms-join.spec and keep
the test logic unchanged; if the flaky-test context needs to be preserved, move
that explanation out of the spec into the PR description or commit message.
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Run ID: 38d38301-ebdb-49c6-bf37-ad0fb4f01e65
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
apps/meteor/tests/e2e/rooms-join.spec.ts
📜 Review details
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout. (5)
- GitHub Check: 📦 Build Packages
- GitHub Check: cubic · AI code reviewer
- GitHub Check: Hacktron Security Check
- GitHub Check: CodeQL-Build
- GitHub Check: CodeQL-Build
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (4)
**/*.{ts,tsx,js}
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.cursor/rules/playwright.mdc)
**/*.{ts,tsx,js}: Write concise, technical TypeScript/JavaScript with accurate typing in Playwright tests
Avoid code comments in the implementation
Files:
apps/meteor/tests/e2e/rooms-join.spec.ts
**/*.spec.ts
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.cursor/rules/playwright.mdc)
**/*.spec.ts: Use descriptive test names that clearly communicate expected behavior in Playwright tests
Use.spec.tsextension for test files (e.g.,login.spec.ts)
Files:
apps/meteor/tests/e2e/rooms-join.spec.ts
apps/meteor/tests/e2e/**/*.spec.ts
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.cursor/rules/playwright.mdc)
apps/meteor/tests/e2e/**/*.spec.ts: All test files must be created inapps/meteor/tests/e2e/directory
Avoid usingpage.locator()in Playwright tests - always prefer semantic locators such aspage.getByRole(),page.getByLabel(),page.getByText(), orpage.getByTitle()
Usetest.beforeAll()andtest.afterAll()for setup/teardown in Playwright tests
Usetest.step()for complex test scenarios to improve organization in Playwright tests
Group related tests in the same file
Utilize Playwright fixtures (test,page,expect) for consistency in test files
Prefer web-first assertions (toBeVisible,toHaveText, etc.) in Playwright tests
Useexpectmatchers for assertions (toEqual,toContain,toBeTruthy,toHaveLength, etc.) instead ofassertstatements in Playwright tests
Usepage.waitFor()with specific conditions instead of hardcoded timeouts in Playwright tests
Implement proper wait strategies for dynamic content in Playwright tests
Maintain test isolation between test cases in Playwright tests
Ensure clean state for each test execution in Playwright tests
Ensure tests run reliably in parallel without shared state conflicts
Files:
apps/meteor/tests/e2e/rooms-join.spec.ts
apps/meteor/tests/e2e/**/*.{ts,spec.ts}
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (.cursor/rules/playwright.mdc)
apps/meteor/tests/e2e/**/*.{ts,spec.ts}: Store commonly used locators in variables/constants for reuse
Follow Page Object Model pattern consistently in Playwright tests
Files:
apps/meteor/tests/e2e/rooms-join.spec.ts
🧠 Learnings (6)
📚 Learning: 2026-02-24T19:22:48.358Z
Learnt from: juliajforesti
Repo: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat PR: 38493
File: apps/meteor/tests/e2e/omnichannel/omnichannel-send-pdf-transcript.spec.ts:66-67
Timestamp: 2026-02-24T19:22:48.358Z
Learning: In Playwright end-to-end tests (e.g., under apps/meteor/tests/e2e/...), prefer locating elements by translated text (getByText) and ARIA roles (getByRole) over data-qa attributes. If translation values change, update the corresponding test locators accordingly. Never use data-qa locators. This guideline applies to all Playwright e2e test specs in the repository and helps keep tests robust to UI text changes and accessible semantics.
Applied to files:
apps/meteor/tests/e2e/rooms-join.spec.ts
📚 Learning: 2026-02-24T19:39:42.247Z
Learnt from: juliajforesti
Repo: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat PR: 38493
File: apps/meteor/tests/e2e/page-objects/fragments/message.ts:7-7
Timestamp: 2026-02-24T19:39:42.247Z
Learning: In RocketChat e2e tests, avoid using data-qa attributes to locate elements. Prefer semantic locators such as getByRole, getByLabel, getByText, getByTitle and ARIA-based selectors. Apply this rule to all TypeScript files under apps/meteor/tests/e2e to improve test reliability, accessibility, and maintainability.
Applied to files:
apps/meteor/tests/e2e/rooms-join.spec.ts
📚 Learning: 2026-02-26T19:25:44.063Z
Learnt from: gabriellsh
Repo: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat PR: 38778
File: packages/ui-voip/src/providers/useMediaSession.ts:192-192
Timestamp: 2026-02-26T19:25:44.063Z
Learning: In the Rocket.Chat repository, do not reference Biome lint rules in code review feedback. Biome is not used even if biome.json exists; only reference Biome rules if there is explicit, project-wide usage documented. For TypeScript files, review lint implications without Biome guidance unless the project enables Biome rules.
Applied to files:
apps/meteor/tests/e2e/rooms-join.spec.ts
📚 Learning: 2026-02-26T19:25:44.063Z
Learnt from: gabriellsh
Repo: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat PR: 38778
File: packages/ui-voip/src/providers/useMediaSession.ts:192-192
Timestamp: 2026-02-26T19:25:44.063Z
Learning: In this repository (RocketChat/Rocket.Chat), Biome lint rules are not used even if a biome.json exists. When reviewing TypeScript files (e.g., packages/ui-voip/src/providers/useMediaSession.ts), ensure lint suggestions do not reference Biome-specific rules. Rely on general ESLint/TypeScript lint rules and project conventions instead.
Applied to files:
apps/meteor/tests/e2e/rooms-join.spec.ts
📚 Learning: 2026-03-06T18:10:15.268Z
Learnt from: tassoevan
Repo: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat PR: 39397
File: packages/gazzodown/src/code/CodeBlock.spec.tsx:47-68
Timestamp: 2026-03-06T18:10:15.268Z
Learning: In tests (especially those using testing-library/dom/jsdom) for Rocket.Chat components, the HTML <code> element has an implicit ARIA role of 'code'. Therefore, screen.getByRole('code') or screen.findByRole('code') will locate <code> elements even without a role attribute. Do not flag findByRole('code') as invalid in reviews; prefer using the implicit role instead of adding role="code" unless necessary for accessibility.
Applied to files:
apps/meteor/tests/e2e/rooms-join.spec.ts
📚 Learning: 2026-05-06T12:21:44.083Z
Learnt from: juliajforesti
Repo: RocketChat/Rocket.Chat PR: 40256
File: apps/meteor/client/components/CreateDiscussion/CreateDiscussion.tsx:121-149
Timestamp: 2026-05-06T12:21:44.083Z
Learning: Field wrappers in rocket.chat/fuselage-forms (Field, FieldLabel, FieldRow, FieldError, FieldHint) auto-create htmlFor/id associations, aria-describedby, and role="alert" for errors. Do not manually set htmlFor, id, aria-describedby, or role attributes when using these wrappers. This automatic wiring does not apply to plain rocket.chat/fuselage components, which require explicit ID wiring per the accessibility docs. In code reviews, prefer using fuselage-forms wrappers for form fields and verify there is no unnecessary manual ID/aria wiring in files that use these wrappers. If a component uses plain fuselage components, ensure proper id wiring as per docs.
Applied to files:
apps/meteor/tests/e2e/rooms-join.spec.ts
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/meteor/tests/e2e/rooms-join.spec.ts (3)
62-64: Block-local precondition correctly removes the racy cross-block coupling.Restoring
preview-c-roomto['admin', 'user', 'anonymous']in this block's owntest.beforeAllmakes the scenario self-contained rather than depending on the prior describe'safterAll, which matches the payload contract inpreview-public-channel.spec.ts:24and is the right fix for serial-block flakiness.
75-75: LGTM!
103-112: LGTM!
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #41072 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 70.09% 70.08% -0.02%
===========================================
Files 3362 3362
Lines 129705 129705
Branches 22466 22470 +4
===========================================
- Hits 90921 90906 -15
- Misses 35465 35480 +15
Partials 3319 3319
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Proposed changes (including videos or screenshots)
Issue(s)
Steps to test or reproduce
Further comments
Summary by CodeRabbit